Docs: clarify getter comments to reference HardwareComponentInterface

[rishitej04]

This PR improves the documentation comments in
hardware_interface/hardware_component_interface.hpp.

Previously, the getter methods (get_clock(), get_node(),
and get_hardware_info()) referred generically to "the Interface".
This wording was ambiguous, since the file defines
HardwareComponentInterface.

The comments have been updated to explicitly reference
HardwareComponentInterface, making the documentation clearer
and easier for new contributors and users to follow.

No functional changes were made — this is purely a documentation fix.

[christophfroehlich]

FYI: this does not fix #2419, can you do that in the same PR please?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.21%. Comparing base (9281169) to head (639b94c).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2471   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.21%   89.21%           
=======================================
  Files         144      144           
  Lines       16334    16334           
  Branches     1393     1393           
=======================================
  Hits        14573    14573           
  Misses       1225     1225           
  Partials      536      536           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	89.21% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ardware_interface/hardware_component_interface.hpp	86.09% <ø> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[christophfroehlich]

@soham2560 what do you think?

[soham2560]

@soham2560 what do you think?

This also works, does make it more clearer and directed towards the class name