-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 305
CI: Re-enable WASM job #819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
#818 was merged -- you can rebase and undraft this. Looks like it worked, nice! |
Un-comment the wasm job now that WASM builds again - maybe.
1e4c21e to
1800e73
Compare
|
That was easy. Props to @andunieee for bringing the issue to our attention. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 1800e73; successfully ran local tests
|
Fucking Github. This did not "pass CI". Github silently disabled all of our checks because the spacing in this PR was wrong. #840. |
|
ouch |
471cd63 ci: delete broken WASM job (Andrew Poelstra) 0d0263e secp-sys: update raw pointer deref syntax in fuzz version of the crate (Andrew Poelstra) d477198 ci: remove now-removed 'hashes' feature from tests (Andrew Poelstra) Pull request description: The incorrectly-indented wasm test from #819 is causing Github to silently disable all of our checks. If you click through to the "Actions" tab of this repo you can see it failing (with a "syntax error on line 1" nonsense error). For example https://github.com/apoelstra/rust-secp256k1/actions/runs/17178718613/workflow Delete the test, and also fix everything else that broke in the meantime. ACKs for top commit: tcharding: ACK 471cd63 Tree-SHA512: b52f86a203cb08f66ecbe2afc6e85d973193373da9d5a8bc7e10ca4f9b0991a69cf30e851b439ad6c463b468d10a35c87540fabc6b9ed877fadd82df74221fe8
1800e7347212e1a532df83a7c15d4c224aa1d310 CI: Re-enable WASM job (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
On top of #818, this was quicker than writing an issue. Maybe it will just work.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1800e7347212e1a532df83a7c15d4c224aa1d310; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 29787ca03f5f3354d635d5cb24a033299385119fdc40d98dbe063aefd04319147c4b72ced5a5b5a411b513138b91cb55e4d4627bc17e1f7c202f3f485a0952e0
1800e7347212e1a532df83a7c15d4c224aa1d310 CI: Re-enable WASM job (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
On top of #818, this was quicker than writing an issue. Maybe it will just work.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1800e7347212e1a532df83a7c15d4c224aa1d310; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 29787ca03f5f3354d635d5cb24a033299385119fdc40d98dbe063aefd04319147c4b72ced5a5b5a411b513138b91cb55e4d4627bc17e1f7c202f3f485a0952e0
On top of #818, this was quicker than writing an issue. Maybe it will just work.