Skip to content

Conversation

Enselic
Copy link
Member

@Enselic Enselic commented Oct 8, 2025

To make debugger stepping intuitive with -Copt-level=0. See the adjusted basic-stepping.rs test.

This is kind of a revert of bd0aae9 (cg_llvm: use index-based loop in write_operand_repeatedly), except we don't revert it, we just make it conditional on opt-level. That commit regressed basic-stepping.rs, but it was not noticed since that test did not exist back then (it was added later in #144876). I have retroactively bisected to find that out.

It seems messy to sprinkle if-cases inside of
write_operand_repeatedly() so make the whole function conditional.

The test that bd0aae9 added in
tests/codegen/issues/issue-111603.rs already use -Copt-level=3, so we don't need to adjust the compiler flags for it to keep passing.

This PR takes us one step closer to fixing #33013.

CC #147426 which is related (there will be trivial conflicts for me to resolve in basic-stepping.rs once one of them lands)

To make debugger stepping intuitive with `-Copt-level=0`. See the
adjusted `basic-stepping.rs` test.

This is kind of a revert of bd0aae9, except we don't revert it,
we just make it conditional on `opt-level`. That commit regressed
`basic-stepping.rs`, but it was not noticed since that test did not
exist back then. I have retroactively bisected to find that out.

It seems messy to sprinkle if-cases inside of the
`write_operand_repeatedly()` so make the whole function conditional.

The test that bd0aae9 added in
`tests/codegen/issues/issue-111603.rs` already use `-Copt-level=3`, so
we don't need to adjust the compiler flags for it to keep passing.
@rustbot rustbot added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 8, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 8, 2025

r? @jdonszelmann

rustbot has assigned @jdonszelmann.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@Enselic Enselic changed the title rustc_codegen_llvm: Require opt-level >= 1 for index-based loop rustc_codegen_llvm: Require opt-level >= 1 for index-based write_operand_repeatedly() loop Oct 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants