Skip to content

Conversation

folkertdev
Copy link
Contributor

This did not work before (e.g. in #1807), but I fixed the LLVM issue in llvm/llvm-project#141786, which is now part of our LLVM.

Do we need to wait with this change for rust's minimum LLVM version to reach this version?

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 29, 2025

r? @Amanieu

rustbot has assigned @Amanieu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

arch: aarch64,arm64ec
- link: "llvm.arm.neon.vrintn.{neon_type}"
arch: arm
arch: aarch64,arm64ec,arm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the arch field is required, even though we now use the same code for all targets that this tool supports, so technically the cfg's could be dropped.

@Amanieu Amanieu added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit bfc1839 Aug 29, 2025
64 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants