-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Fix to use getter to get object names #2931
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @KodaiD, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've opened this pull request to address a minor omission from a previous change, ensuring consistency and adherence to best practices within our test suite. The primary goal is to refactor specific test cases in DistributedStorageAdminIntegrationTestBase to utilize getter methods for retrieving object names like table and column names, rather than directly accessing static constants. This change improves the robustness and maintainability of our integration tests by aligning them with proper encapsulation principles.
Highlights
- Test Code Refinement: Updated
createIndex_ForNonExistingColumn_ShouldThrowIllegalArgumentExceptionto usegetTable1()instead ofTABLE1for retrieving the table name. - Test Code Refinement: Modified
dropIndex_ForNonExistingTable_ShouldThrowIllegalArgumentExceptionto usegetColumnName2()instead ofCOL_NAME2for retrieving the column name. - Test Code Refinement: Changed
dropIndex_ForNonExistingIndex_ShouldThrowIllegalArgumentExceptionto usegetTable1()andgetColumnName2()instead ofTABLE1andCOL_NAME2respectively.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly replaces direct access to constants like TABLE1 and COL_NAME2 with their corresponding getter methods (getTable1(), getColumnName2()) in DistributedStorageAdminIntegrationTestBase. This change improves consistency and maintainability of the test suite by adhering to the intended pattern of using getters, which allows for easier extension and overriding in subclasses. The changes are clean, targeted, and successfully address the omission from the previous refactoring. The changes look good.
brfrn169
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thank you!
Description
This PR fixes the test to use a getter to retrieve the object name. This fix addresses on omission from the following PR:
#2908
Related issues and/or PRs
#2908
Changes made
Fix to use getter to get
TABLE1andCOL_NAME2inDistributedStorageAdminIntegrationTestBaseChecklist
Additional notes (optional)
N/A
Release notes
N/A