Skip to content

Conversation

@brfrn169
Copy link
Collaborator

@brfrn169 brfrn169 commented Aug 1, 2025

Description

This PR includes an addendum related to #2915.

Related issues and/or PRs

Changes made

  • Corrected a typo in CoreError.
  • Renamed a method that had a confusing name in NoMutationException.

Checklist

The following is a best-effort checklist. If any items in this checklist are not applicable to this PR or are dependent on other, unmerged PRs, please still mark the checkboxes after you have read and understood each item.

  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • I have considered whether similar issues could occur in other products, components, or modules if this PR is for bug fixes.
  • Any remaining open issues linked to this PR are documented and up-to-date (Jira, GitHub, etc.).
  • Tests (unit, integration, etc.) have been added for the changes.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • Any dependent changes in other PRs have been merged and published.

Additional notes (optional)

N/A

Release notes

N/A

@brfrn169 brfrn169 requested a review from Copilot August 1, 2025 14:00
@brfrn169 brfrn169 self-assigned this Aug 1, 2025
@brfrn169 brfrn169 added the bugfix label Aug 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR corrects naming issues in the consensus commit module by fixing a typo in an error constant and renaming a confusing method. The changes improve code clarity and maintainability by making identifiers more descriptive and accurate.

  • Fixed typo in CONSENSUS_COMMIT_CANNOT_COORDINATOR_STATUS error constant name
  • Renamed misleading method addTransactionIdToMessage to addMutationDetailsToMessage in NoMutationException

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
CommitHandler.java Updated references to use the corrected error constant name
NoMutationException.java Renamed method to better reflect its actual functionality
CoreError.java Fixed typo in error constant name from CANNOT_COORDINATOR_STATUS to CANNOT_GET_COORDINATOR_STATUS

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @brfrn169, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces minor but impactful code quality improvements, primarily focusing on enhancing clarity and consistency within error messaging and internal method naming. It addresses a typo in an error constant and renames a helper method to better reflect its purpose, contributing to more understandable error diagnostics and a cleaner codebase, particularly within the Consensus Commit module.

Highlights

  • Error Message Clarity: Corrected a typo in the CoreError enum constant name from CONSENSUS_COMMIT_CANNOT_COORDINATOR_STATUS to CONSENSUS_COMMIT_CANNOT_GET_COORDINATOR_STATUS. This improves the accuracy and readability of error messages related to retrieving coordinator status in Consensus Commit.
  • Method Naming Refinement: Renamed the private static method addTransactionIdToMessage to addMutationDetailsToMessage within NoMutationException. This change provides a more precise description of the method's function, as it appends details about mutations, not just transaction IDs, to the exception message.
  • Code Consistency: Updated all references to the previously mistyped CoreError enum constant in CommitHandler to use the newly corrected name, ensuring consistency across the codebase.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves code clarity and maintainability by correcting a typo in CoreError and renaming a confusing method in NoMutationException. The corresponding call sites have been updated accordingly.

@brfrn169
Copy link
Collaborator Author

brfrn169 commented Aug 1, 2025

Since this is a very minor change, I'll merge this.

@brfrn169 brfrn169 merged commit 336b8a1 into master Aug 1, 2025
107 of 109 checks passed
@brfrn169 brfrn169 deleted the improve-logging-in-consensus-commit-addendum branch August 1, 2025 15:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant