Skip to content

Conversation

@eseiler
Copy link
Member

@eseiler eseiler commented Mar 19, 2025

https://docs.seqan.de/codechecker/sharg

After this, only shadowing stuff should remain.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran and removed lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran labels Mar 19, 2025
@seqan-actions
Copy link
Member

Documentation preview available at https://docs.seqan.de/preview/seqan/sharg-parser/269

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran and removed lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran labels Mar 19, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.62%. Comparing base (77c657a) to head (2e691ec).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
include/sharg/detail/format_tdl.hpp 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #269      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.63%   94.62%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        1733     1731       -2     
  Branches       46       46              
==========================================
- Hits         1640     1638       -2     
  Misses         93       93              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@eseiler eseiler merged commit c4fa513 into seqan:main Mar 19, 2025
36 checks passed
@eseiler eseiler deleted the fix/codechecker2 branch March 19, 2025 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants