Skip to content

Conversation

@spike-rabbit
Copy link
Member

Sometimes playwright is faster than our app.
We need to slow it down by checking for certain
state before proceeding.

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why. Add relevant
screenshots and reference related issues via Closes #XY or Related to #XY.


Sometimes playwright is faster than our app.
We need to slow it down by checking for certain
state before proceeding.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @spike-rabbit, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request improves the reliability of an end-to-end test for the filtered search component. It introduces a synchronization step to prevent race conditions where the test runner might execute actions before the application's UI has fully updated, thereby making the test more stable and less prone to intermittent failures.

Highlights

  • E2E Test Hardening: An explicit wait condition has been added to the si-filtered-search e2e test. This ensures that a specific element is focused before proceeding with keyboard interactions, which resolves potential flakiness caused by Playwright running faster than the application's UI updates.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request hardens an end-to-end test for the filtered search component by adding an explicit wait for an element to be focused before proceeding with keyboard interactions. This is a good practice to prevent test flakiness. I've suggested a small improvement to make the Playwright locator even more specific and robust, further improving test stability.

// remove score criterion
await page.keyboard.press('Shift+Tab');
await page.keyboard.press('Shift+Tab');
await expect(page.locator('.criterion-value-text', { hasText: 'Good' })).toBeFocused();

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better test robustness, it's good practice to use more specific locators. Chaining locators can help scope the search and prevent potential flakiness if other elements with similar properties are added to the page in the future. You could scope this locator to the 'Score' pill to make it more specific.

Suggested change
await expect(page.locator('.criterion-value-text', { hasText: 'Good' })).toBeFocused();
await expect(page.locator('.pill-group', { hasText: 'Score' }).locator('.criterion-value-text', { hasText: 'Good' })).toBeFocused();

@github-actions
Copy link

Code Coverage

@github-actions
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants