Skip to content

Conversation

myieye
Copy link
Collaborator

@myieye myieye commented Mar 24, 2025

Resolves #1555

ShouldCheckForUpdate is no longer unintentionaly dependant on the time of day the code runs.

I tried to add a test, but couldn't figure out how to properly reference the Maui project or the Windows specific code or how to run the tests. 🙃

You can see my effort here: #1557

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted the update check mechanism to ensure version evaluations occur reliably and at the proper intervals.
  • Chores
    • Enhanced logging to provide clearer insights into when update checks are initiated, aiding in smoother system monitoring.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the ShouldCheckForUpdate method in the Windows AppUpdateService. The logic now uses TotalHours instead of Hours for time comparisons. Thresholds have been adjusted—from checking if the last update was less than 20 hours ago to less than 8 hours—and additional log statements have been added. These logs indicate when an update check is forced, why an update check is skipped due to recent checks, or when an update check is triggered based on the last check time.

Changes

File Change Summary
backend/.../Windows/AppUpdateService.cs Updated ShouldCheckForUpdate: replaced Hours with TotalHours for accurate time comparisons, changed threshold from 20 to 8 hours, and added descriptive log statements for forced and conditional update checks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant AppUpdateService
    participant Logger

    Caller->>AppUpdateService: ShouldCheckForUpdate()
    alt ForceUpdateCheckEnvVar is set
        AppUpdateService->>Logger: Log "Forced update check triggered"
        AppUpdateService-->>Caller: Return update check result (true)
    else
        AppUpdateService->>AppUpdateService: Calculate timeSinceLastCheck (TotalHours)
        alt timeSinceLastCheck.TotalHours < -1
            AppUpdateService->>Logger: Log "Last update check is in the future"
            AppUpdateService-->>Caller: Return false
        else if timeSinceLastCheck.TotalHours < 8
            AppUpdateService->>Logger: Log "Skipping update: last check too recent"
            AppUpdateService-->>Caller: Return false
        else
            AppUpdateService->>Logger: Log "Triggering update check based on last check time"
            AppUpdateService-->>Caller: Return true
        end
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
[#1555] Use TotalHours instead of Hours for auto-update time comparisons

Poem

I hopped through the lines of code today,
Tweaked my checks in a clever, timely way,
Logging each step with a happy little glow,
From forced updates to checks that softly slow,
With carrot-like precision, my code hops free,
A rabbit’s cheer in every commit 🐰💻!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f72482 and 3656160.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/FwLite/FwLiteMaui/Platforms/Windows/AppUpdateService.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • backend/FwLite/FwLiteMaui/Platforms/Windows/AppUpdateService.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Build FW Lite and run tests
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 412bd50 and 5f72482.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/FwLite/FwLiteMaui/Platforms/Windows/AppUpdateService.cs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
  • GitHub Check: Build FW Lite and run tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/FwLite/FwLiteMaui/Platforms/Windows/AppUpdateService.cs (3)

212-217: Good switch to TotalHours for checking future timestamps

Great improvement changing from Hours to TotalHours for detecting if the last check time is in the future. This ensures accuracy when the difference spans across day boundaries.


218-222: Using TotalHours and threshold adjustment

Good change to use TotalHours instead of Hours for checking the time since the last update check. This makes the check independent of the time of day when the code is executed.

Note that the threshold has been reduced from 20 hours to 8 hours, which means updates will be checked more frequently. This is likely intentional but worth confirming.

Was the reduction in threshold from 20 to 8 hours intentional? This will increase the frequency of update checks.


224-225: Improved logging for update check decisions

The added log message provides valuable information about why an update check is being performed, which will help with debugging and monitoring.

Copy link
Collaborator

@hahn-kev hahn-kev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me. The only thing I might consider is changing it from logging info to logging debug or trace. But we can lower it if this gets too noisy

@hahn-kev hahn-kev merged commit 33effea into develop Mar 27, 2025
11 checks passed
@hahn-kev hahn-kev deleted the bug/1555-auto-update-check-uses-hours-component-of-timespan-rather-than-totalhours branch March 27, 2025 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Auto-Update check uses Hours component of TimeSpan rather than TotalHours

2 participants