- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 76
 
billing: clarify refund and consolidate sections for Enterprise Starter #975
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| 
           The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 
  | 
    
| 
               | 
          ||
| ## Are there any refunds for the subscription? | ||
| 
               | 
          ||
| We don't offer refunds, but if you have any queries regarding the Enterprise Starter, please write to [email protected], and we'll help resolve the issue. | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not aligned with our terms IMO, see section 8.3 of https://sourcegraph.com/terms/cloud
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
God damn it, our dark background page design literally killed my eyes. I think it actually aligns?
All fees and charges are earned upon receipt by us and are nonrefundable unless negotiated otherwise
Contacting support is applicable for "negotiated otherwise"? BTW this repo and our comments here are public.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the "or (b) as required by applicable law." section is missing here for me.
Maybe we could link to terms? (deeplinking is sadly broken there)
Not a lawyer but this statement feels incomplete to me. Won't block here but I think it could use some wordsmithing haha
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
deeplinking is sadly broken there
Already asked for a fix! https://sourcegraph.slack.com/archives/CNC4YAL1E/p1739389461245829 so we can still do deep link and wait for it to be fixed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's wait for legal response first!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nudged again on the Legal thread for a suggested wording. If we couldn't get a effective response by tomorrow, I am gonna merge as-is first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unblock
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM thanks
| 
           @unknwon please merge if we are ready. :)  | 
    
          
 We are waiting for Legal response for the exact wording to be used/updated here, will update and merge once we are ready.  | 
    
| 
           Merging as-is and will follow up later once we get a firm response from Legal.  | 
    

Closes https://linear.app/sourcegraph/issue/CORE-725/workspacesbilling-add-refund-policy-to-billing-faq