META:Add AI use policy. #2531#2538
Merged
Silverarmor merged 7 commits intospotDL:devfrom Oct 26, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Silverarmor
requested changes
Oct 17, 2025
Co-authored-by: Jayden <23619946+Silverarmor@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jayden <23619946+Silverarmor@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jayden <23619946+Silverarmor@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jayden <23619946+Silverarmor@users.noreply.github.com>
Silverarmor
requested changes
Oct 26, 2025
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds an AI use policy to the contributing guidelines, establishing clear rules about the use of AI/LLM tools in creating issues and pull requests. The policy aims to reduce maintainer workload by preventing low-quality automated contributions.
Key Changes:
- Added a new section "AUTOMATED CONTRIBUTIONS (AI / LLM) POLICY" to the contributing guidelines
- Defined acceptable and unacceptable uses of AI tools for contributions
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Comment on lines
+94
to
+95
| The rationale behind this policy is that automated contributions are a waste of the maintainers' time. Humans spend their time and brainpower reviewing every submission. Issues or pull requests generated by automation tools create an imbalance of effort between the submitter and the reviewer. Nobody learns anything when a maintainer reviews code written by an LLM. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] This paragraph is very long and difficult to read. Consider breaking it into multiple shorter sentences or bullet points for better readability.
Suggested change
| The rationale behind this policy is that automated contributions are a waste of the maintainers' time. Humans spend their time and brainpower reviewing every submission. Issues or pull requests generated by automation tools create an imbalance of effort between the submitter and the reviewer. Nobody learns anything when a maintainer reviews code written by an LLM. | |
| The rationale behind this policy is: | |
| - Automated contributions are a waste of the maintainers' time. | |
| - Humans spend their time and brainpower reviewing every submission. | |
| - Issues or pull requests generated by automation tools create an imbalance of effort between the submitter and the reviewer. | |
| - Nobody learns anything when a maintainer reviews code written by an LLM. |
Silverarmor
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Title
Added an AI conetent policy as requested by @Silverarmor in issuse #2531
Description
Wrote my own AI policy based on the YT-DLP policy.
Related Issue
#2531
Motivation and Context
Reduces worload on maintainers and contributors.
How Has This Been Tested?
N/A
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Types of Changes
Documentation
Checklist