Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
25 changes: 25 additions & 0 deletions docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -74,6 +74,31 @@ Depending on how large the project is, you may want to outsource the questioning
> that you have the necessary rights to the content and that the content you contribute may be
> provided under the project license.

---

### AUTOMATED CONTRIBUTIONS (AI / LLM) POLICY

#### AI Use
- It is in everyone's best interest to **not** submit issues, pull requests or feature requests that are AI-generated.
- All such requests will be closed and submitters will be blocked from the repository.

#### You must...
- Be able to understand and respond to questions relating to the issue or the fix you provide.
- You *can* use an AI tool for proofreading, translating or understanding the issue's content.
- You **cannot** use AI tools to generate the issue text, or the issue itself.

#### Pull Requests
- You should be able to explain every part of the code you have written/modified in your PR.
- If you do not understand your PR, **do not** submit it. You cannot use an AI tool to generate code for you.

The rationale behind this policy is that automated contributions are a waste of the maintainers' time. Humans spend their time and brainpower reviewing every submission. Issues or pull requests generated by automation tools create an imbalance of effort between the submitter and the reviewer. Nobody learns anything when a maintainer reviews code written by an LLM.

Comment on lines +94 to +95
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] This paragraph is very long and difficult to read. Consider breaking it into multiple shorter sentences or bullet points for better readability.

Suggested change
The rationale behind this policy is that automated contributions are a waste of the maintainers' time. Humans spend their time and brainpower reviewing every submission. Issues or pull requests generated by automation tools create an imbalance of effort between the submitter and the reviewer. Nobody learns anything when a maintainer reviews code written by an LLM.
The rationale behind this policy is:
- Automated contributions are a waste of the maintainers' time.
- Humans spend their time and brainpower reviewing every submission.
- Issues or pull requests generated by automation tools create an imbalance of effort between the submitter and the reviewer.
- Nobody learns anything when a maintainer reviews code written by an LLM.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Additionally, such AI-generated content impedes legitimate issues and feature requests that would add more value to the project.


---


### Reporting Bugs

<!-- omit in toc -->
Expand Down
Loading