feat: add constants/float32/max-safe-nth-tribonacci

[Neerajpathak07]

Resolves #6050.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• adds constants/float32/max-safe-nth-tribonacci to expand the scope for float32 operations.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• resolves [RFC]: add constants/float32/max-safe-nth-tribonacci #6050

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
constants/float32/max-safe-nth-tribonacci	$\color{green}49/49$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}0/0$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}49/49$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[Neerajpathak07]

@kgryte @Planeshifter LMK your views on this

[kgryte]

LGTM

[kgryte]

Sorry. I take this back. @Neerajpathak07 how did you calculate the maximum safe tribonacci? When checking in the REPL, I find

In [40]: base.tribonacci(30)
Out[40]: 15902591

In [41]: FLOAT32_MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
Out[41]: 16777215

In [42]: base.tribonacci(31)
Out[42]: 29249425

base.tribonacci( 35 ) far exceeds the maximum safe float32.

[Neerajpathak07]

@kgryte Was using a external Float Converter which would be the reason for the inaccurate values. Was having doubts on how to use the repl to find the values.
Will be going with tribonacci( 30 ) as the value resides well below the safe integer limit.