Skip to content

feat!: refactor Bartlett's test to return a class instance #6056

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat!: refactor Bartlett's test to return a class instance #6056

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Planeshifter
Copy link
Member

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • refactors the Bartlett’s test package to return a class instance instead of a plain object and updates implementation.

This PR introduces a breaking change since print() has been renamed to toString().

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@Planeshifter
feat!: refactor implementation to return a class instance
827699b 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. label Mar 15, 2025
@Planeshifter
docs: update example code
a6f768d 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Mar 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/bartlett-test $\color{red}541/545$
$\color{green}+99.27\%$ 		$\color{red}56/57$
$\color{green}+98.25\%$ 		$\color{red}8/10$
$\color{green}+80.00\%$ 		$\color{red}541/545$
$\color{green}+99.27\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: Update Bartlett test

2 participants

@Planeshifter @stdlib-bot