feat: add ndarray/some-by

[headlessNode]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: passed
• task: lint_repl_help status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: na
• task: lint_c_examples status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Progresses #2656 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• add ndarray/some-by

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• progresses [RFC]: achieve ndarray API parity with built-in JavaScript arrays  #2656

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
ndarray/some-by	$\color{red}376/600$ $\color{green}+62.67\%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{red}0/3$ $\color{green}+0.00\%$	$\color{red}376/600$ $\color{green}+62.67\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[headlessNode]

@kgryte ready 🤞🏻

[kgryte]

LGTM after clean-up, especially wrt argument juggling.

[Planeshifter]

@kgryte @headlessNode Should the condition be inverted here?

[kgryte]

Yes. Thank you for catching.