Skip to content

Conversation

hrshya
Copy link
Contributor

@hrshya hrshya commented Jun 15, 2025

Resolves none .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • replaces manual for loop in examples for stats/base/dists/exponential/* packages.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

  • resolves no related issues.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jun 15, 2025
@hrshya hrshya added the Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. label Jun 15, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dists/exponential/cdf $\color{green}275/275$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}20/20$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}275/275$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/entropy $\color{green}162/162$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}162/162$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/kurtosis $\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/logcdf $\color{green}279/279$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}20/20$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}279/279$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/logpdf $\color{green}281/281$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}23/23$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}281/281$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/mean $\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/median $\color{green}162/162$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}162/162$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/mgf $\color{green}270/270$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}21/21$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}270/270$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/mode $\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/pdf $\color{green}283/283$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}23/23$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}283/283$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/quantile $\color{green}283/283$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}23/23$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}283/283$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/skewness $\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/stdev $\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/exponential/variance $\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}161/161$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

Copy link
Member

@Planeshifter Planeshifter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. label Jun 15, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Jun 15, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR Commit Message

docs: replace manual `for` loop in examples

PR-URL: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/pull/7367

Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <[email protected]>

Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter merged commit 0449885 into stdlib-js:develop Jun 15, 2025
83 checks passed
@hrshya hrshya deleted the docs/epcdf branch October 11, 2025 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants