Skip to content

Conversation

@fireairforce
Copy link

object 太大导致 link_value 超出了 LIMIT_NODE_SIZE,导致 link_value 被处理成了 JsValue::Unknown 类型。

从而没触发 handle_free_var 的变量替换逻辑。

Related issue: utooland/utoo#2388

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @fireairforce, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a critical bug in Turbopack's ECMAScript analysis where excessively large JavaScript objects were incorrectly processed as unknown values. This misclassification prevented essential variable replacement logic from executing, leading to incorrect code generation. The fix introduces a more robust condition for handling free variables, ensuring that even large objects are properly evaluated and processed, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the module analysis.

Highlights

  • Fix for large object handling: Addressed an issue where large JavaScript objects caused link_value to return JsValue::Unknown, preventing the handle_free_var logic from being triggered for variable replacement.
  • Refined handle_free_var condition: Modified the condition for calling handle_free_var to ensure it's invoked not only when linked_value is known, but also when a FreeVar might be present in free_var_references, even if link_value initially returned Unknown due to object size.
  • Improved code generation for large objects: The change ensures that ConstantValueCodeGen is correctly applied for large objects that were previously misidentified as Unknown, thereby fixing potential issues with code generation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

这个 PR 修复了当一个对象过大时,link_value 变为 Unknown 从而跳过 handle_free_var 调用的问题。通过增加一个额外的检查,确保即使在这种情况下,如果变量存在于 free_var_references 中,handle_free_var 仍然会被调用,这解决了根本问题。代码逻辑看起来是正确的。我有一个关于简化代码和提高可读性的建议。

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@fireairforce fireairforce merged commit 76167ad into utoo Dec 10, 2025
13 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants