-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
[RSDK-10385] Don't enforce compiler minima or complain about warnings for conan builds #411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5c314f3
[RSDK-10385] Permit builds with VS 2019 16.10+
acmorrow ab65119
Revert "[RSDK-10385] Permit builds with VS 2019 16.10+"
acmorrow d550712
[RSDK-10385] Don't enforce compiler minima or complain about warnings…
acmorrow d0b0974
[RSDK-10385] Eliminate wrapper struct for VS2019 compat
acmorrow 3084f99
[RSDK-10385] Remove unhelpful typedef as well
acmorrow File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks like this is still causing issues, now with additional compilers. a couple thoughts. so i think usually our alias declarations would use camel case, and if the declarations above were
using Step = ...andusing Steps = ...there would be no issue here.that said, i'm sort of thinking we should just write
std::vector<[Ss]tep>and call it a day. the alias forunordered_mapfeels ergonomically justified, avectoralias less so. and generally speaking we don't have many instances in the sdk of doingusing meows = std::vector<meow>and i suppose i'm not crazy about the practice in general.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that makes sense. I've made that change.