-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 772
spec css3 color issues closed
Issues raised, resolved, and closed for CSS3 color.
These tasks were completed and issues were resolved and incorporated into the 2011-06-07 REC.
The CSS3 Color Module on its way to PR required the following tasks:
- Update sRGB reference in Bibliography. See Issue 30 resolution.
- Chris Lilley (done)
- Post Disposition of comments (done, at: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-color/issues-lc-2008.html )
- Chris Lilley
- Get responses back from commentors (done)
- Schedule directors call
- Chris Lilley
- Obtain publication date for PR
- Chris Lilley
- PR review form for AC representatives of W3C member organizations
- perhaps at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/css3-color-PR/
- note PR Review Deadline for filling out that form
- Chris Lilley
- Update PR Editor's draft with:
- link to actual disposition of comments (from above)
- link to actual PR review form (from above)
- actual PR Review Dealine - replace PR-REVIEW-DEADLINE-DD-MONTH-YYYY
- Tantek Çelik
- arrange publication with webmaster
- check against pubrules
- Chris Lilley
- CSS3 Color PR is published!
The following were known problems in the 21 July 2008 css3-color Last Call Working Draft.
See the released and development versions of the test suite for the "Tests" references.
Summary: css3-color should have a useful index or it should be removed Raised by: David Baron URL: N/A Proposed Resolution: improve index Status: editorial, spec edited to improve index
Summary: restructure TOC Raised by: Christolph Päper URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0405.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0443.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008May/0182.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Aug/0013.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Aug/0019.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Oct/0229.html Further discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Oct/0230.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0841.html Proposed Resolution 1: no change, to preserve section number stability Proposed Resolution 2: similar to what is proposed, but moving the gamma correction section (probably modified, per later issue) into the beginning of Color Units, and perhaps putting the units before the values Status: resolved to make no change, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0169.html
Summary: rename sections giving color keywords Raised by: various URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008May/0146.html Proposed Resolution: Probably rename, given the confusion this has caused Status: draft sections renamed per above URL to "Basic color keywords" and "Extended color keywords"
Summary: report of browser bugs from test suite Raised by: Paul Tykodi URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jun/0023.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jun/0029.html Proposed Resolution: not a spec issue Status: not a spec issue
Summary: still confused about interaction of opacity and rgba() Raised by: Matt Bonner URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jun/0024.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0451.html Proposed Resolution: normative reference to SVG 1.1 simple alpha compositing Status: spec edited
Summary: opacity should only apply to in-flow children, and shouldn't create a stacking context Raised by: Andrew Fedoniuk URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0139.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0142.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0145.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0166.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0167.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0168.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0170.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0173.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0244.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0245.html Note: same as issue 20 on previous issues list Proposed Resolution: no change Status: ### Issue 7 Summary: ICC features shouldn't be removed Raised by: Chris Murphy URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0184.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0189.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0191.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0205.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0208.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0225.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0230.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0241.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0258.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0259.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0278.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0281.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Aug/0072.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Aug/0269.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Aug/0270.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0147.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0148.html Proposed Resolution: no change Status: ### Issue 8 Summary: Gamma correction section is out of date Raised by: Chris Murphy URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0185.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0229.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0459.html Resolution: remove section (resolved, 2009-11-03 F2F meeting) Status: spec edited
Summary: opacity relative to multiple ancestors Raised by: Marshal Horn URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0409.html Proposed Resolution: reject all new features (and not sure what this one means, either) Status: no change
Summary: presentation of HTML4 keywords and SVG keywords is inconsistent Raised by: David Perrell URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0457.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0462.html Proposed Resolution: change HTML4 table to look like SVG Table Status: spec edited
Summary: include HSL values in color tables Raised by: David Perrell URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0457.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0462.html Proposed Resolution: no change, since they wouldn't be exact matches due to rounding issues, and then there would be ambiguity Status: no change
Summary: does HSL get mapped to the sRGB color space Raised by: David Perrell URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0458.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0461.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0463.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0468.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0472.html Proposed Resolution 1: no change (question already answered in spec) Proposed Resolution 2: add a statement with "must" in it to state the equivalence as a conformance requirement Status: ### Issue 13 Summary: remove paragraph about clipping values outside gamut Raised by: Chris Murphy URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0459.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0460.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0464.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0465.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0466.html Proposed Resolution: gamut clipping clarified to be to device gamut Status: spec edited
Summary: unnecessary tautology Raised by: Dave Singer URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0467.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0469.html Proposed Resolution: edit section 3 accordingly to remove redundant or tautological text Status: spec edited - no more section 3.1.1
Summary: Is HSL full range or video range? Raised by: Dave Singer URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0467.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0842.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0845.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0844.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0850.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0845.html Proposed Resolution: no change Status: no change
Summary: currentColor should not be treated as color:inherit at parse time (and color:inherit should have a space in it) Raised by: Krzysztof Maczyński URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0539.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0540.html Note: same as issue 17 on previous issues list, due to insufficient editing the previous time around Proposed Resolution: do the additional edits to match the previous resolution Status: spec edited
Summary: long list of editorial comments from XSL FO SG (excluding comment on status section, which is the next issue) Raised by: Tony Graham URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0004.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0848.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0849.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0054.html Proposed Resolution: editorial, mostly accepted Status: most issues edited. computed value of system colors split out into issue 28, since I think it's wrong. Case consistency of hex not addressed (not worth it). "something similar" comment not addressed (not worth it). Disagree about "lookup table" issue for 4.2.4. Disagree about system colors section nesting issue (don't want to change section numbers).
Summary: definition of interoperable should be changed Raised by: marbux (in response to Tony Graham) URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0004.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0006.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0169.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0173.html Proposed Resolution: no change. ignore legal trolls, or rather, escalate them to W3C legal (which Daniel has done per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Sep/0173.html) and let them sort it out. in the mean while, proceed with business as usual. Status: no change.
Summary: statement about advantages of HSL to RGB should not pretend to be exhaustive Raised by: Dave Singer URL: private email to dbaron, 2008-07-28 Proposed Resolution: editorial, edit to add "Some" before "advantages". Status: spec edited
Summary: need to define deprecated in a way that still requires UAs to support them (and thus need conformance requirements!) Raised by: Rich Schwerdtfeger URL: minutes of CSS meeting, 2008-10-20, morning session: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0023.html Proposed resolution: no edit. existing definition section references CSS 2.1 definitions which defines deprecated that way. Status: no edit needed.
Summary: note pointing to appearance property should link to it Raised by: Steve Zilles URL: minutes of CSS meeting, 2008-10-20, morning session: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0023.html Proposed Resolution: do so Status: spec edited
Summary: don't deprecate system colors Raised by: Krzysztof Maczyński URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0097.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0106.html Proposed Resolution: editorial feedback accepted. request to not deprecate rejected. Status: spec edited to re-use some of the "If you want to emulate " wording suggested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0106.html
Summary: Accept angle units and allow omission of % units in hsl() Raised by: Ludger Buenger URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jul/0154.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jul/0155.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jul/0156.html Proposed resolution: no change
Summary: Mac OS X changing gamma, recommendations obsolete Raised by: Chris Murphy URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jul/0171.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0189.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0190.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0191.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0215.html Resolution: section already removed to resolve issue 8 Status: spec edited
Summary: case of currentColor is odd Raised by: David Perrell URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0313.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0314.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0341.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0342.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0355.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0384.html Proposed Resolution: no change
Summary: add mechanism for migrating to being conformant to the part of the spec that says CSS colors are in sRGB Raised by: David Baron, Beth Dakin URL: minutes of F2F meeting, 2009-11-03 (have resolution) Resolution: updated: do this in CSS4-color instead: "RESOLUTION: re-add a 'color-correction' property with the two values 'default' and 'srgb'", "'default': what UA would do if the property weren't specified at all. That can change over time. (E.g., at the moment we (Safari/Webkit) don't do color managament at all. But we may do so in the future.)", "'srgb': All colors are presumed to be defined in the sRGB color space unless a more precise embedded profile is specified within content data. For images that do have a profile built into their data, that profile is used. For images that do not have a profile, the sRGB profile is used so that the colors in these images can be kept "in synch" with the colors specified in CSS and HTML." Status: no edit in CSS3-color.
Summary: should depend on CSS 2.1 instead of css3-syntax and css3-values Raised by: David Baron Proposed Resolution: normative reference to CSS 2.1, informative to css3-syntax and css3-values Status: spec edited
Summary: computed value of system colors should be a color, not the keyword itself Raised by: David Baron URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0849.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0053.html Proposed Resolution: just remove the note saying otherwise Status: spec edited.
Summary: "predefined" doesn't make sense in context (used twice) Raised by: David Baron Proposed Resolution: change to 'color keyword' Status: editorial, spec edited
Summary: sRGB reference needs to be updated, check other references too Raised by: Chris Lilley Reporters response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0070.html Proposed Resolution: update them. Note: When I (Tantek) last asked Chris Lilley about what should we update the [SRGB] reference to, he said we should use the same reference as the latest SVG.
From http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/refs.html :
IEC 61966-2-1: 1999: Multimedia systems and equipment — Colour measurement and management — Part 2-1: Colour management — Default RGB colour space — sRGB, International Electrotechnical Commission, 1999. ISBN 2-8318-4989-6 as ammended by Amendment A1:2003. Available at http://webstore.iec.ch/webstore/webstore.nsf/artnum/025408 and at http://www.colour.org/tc8-05/Docs/colorspace/61966-2-1.pdf .
Where the first part of the text up to and including "sRGB," (without the comma) links to: http://www.colour.org/tc8-05/Docs/colorspace/61966-2-1.pdf Status: updated the shared bibliography for the CSS specs accordingly.
Summary: add CIE color specification to CSS3 color Raised by: Alexis Shaw URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0313.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0330.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0341.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0341.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0462.html (then drifted off topic) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0853.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0857.html Proposed Resolution: no change for CSS3, consider for later specification Status: no change
Summary: HSL Tables Raised by: Christoph Päper URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0312.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0076.html Proposed Resolution: editorial change made Status: edits done
Summary: light goldenrod yellow Raised by: Christoph Päper URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0312.html Reporter's response to resolution: ; Proposed Resolution : spec is correct, no change Status: no change
Summary: transparent Raised by: Christoph Päper URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0312.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0077.html Proposed Resolution: no change in CSS3 Color Status: no change
Summary: CIE colorimetry Raised by: Etan Wexler URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0355.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0472.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0071.html Reporter's response to resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0116.html Proposed Resolution: edit references following guidance from Alan Robertson, Chair, CIE TC 1-57 Status: bibliographic references updated