chore(github): add CODEOWNERS file and remove pr-description workflow #1998
Conversation
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
StarpTech
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)
28-29: Clarify or hide the new “@coderabbitai summary” placeholderThe plain-text placeholder will show up in every PR body.
If the intent is solely for tooling consumption, consider commenting it out to avoid confusing contributors, e.g.:-@coderabbitai summary +<!-- @coderabbitai summary -->.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
1-2: Typo in comment – “expections” → “exceptions”A quick cosmetic fix keeps the file professional and readable.
-# Give everyone ownership for everything expections listed below +# Give everyone ownership for everything exceptions listed below
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/CODEOWNERS(1 hunks).github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
7-30: Verify directory path patternsSome entries (e.g.
cli,router) omit a trailing slash.
Without the slash GitHub matches both a directory and any single file of that name at repo-root, which may or may not be what you expect.Example adjustment:
-cli +cli/Please double-check each rule to ensure the intended coverage.
If the current behaviour is desired, feel free to ignore this note.
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/CODEOWNERS (3)
1-1: Fix typo in introductory comment.
expections→exceptions.
Avoid typos in comments to keep the file professional and unambiguous.-# Give everyone ownership for everything expections listed below +# Give everyone ownership for everything exceptions listed below
7-30: Clarify that patterns refer to directories by appending a trailing “/”.Without the trailing slash GitHub treats the token as either a file or a directory.
Appending “/” makes the intent explicit, avoids accidental matches with files of the
same name, and follows the style used in most official examples.-admission-server -cdn-server -cli -composition -composition-go -connect -connect-go -controlplane -data_migrations -graphqlmetrics -helm -infrastructure -keycloak -otelcollector -playground -proto -protographic -router -router-plugin -router-tests -shared -studio -router/pkg/pubsub +admission-server/ +cdn-server/ +cli/ +composition/ +composition-go/ +connect/ +connect-go/ +controlplane/ +data_migrations/ +graphqlmetrics/ +helm/ +infrastructure/ +keycloak/ +otelcollector/ +playground/ +proto/ +protographic/ +router/ +router-plugin/ +router-tests/ +shared/ +studio/ +# Cosmo Streams / EDFS +router/pkg/pubsub/(Keep owner lists unchanged.)
This is a style/clarity tweak; behavior changes only in fringe cases where a file called
cli(etc.) exists.
Make sure such files don’t exist before applying.
2-2: Consider moving the catch-all*pattern to the end for readability.Matching precedence is “last rule wins”, so the current layout is technically fine,
but most CODEOWNERS files place the generic rule last to make override logic clearer
to future maintainers.
No action required if you prefer the current ordering.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/CODEOWNERS(1 hunks).github/workflows/pr-description.yml(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr-description.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new CODEOWNERS file to specify code ownership and review responsibilities across the repository, modifies the pull request template by replacing the detailed "Motivation and Context" prompt with a single-line placeholder, and removes the GitHub Actions workflow that previously enforced PR description quality checks. Changes
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai summary |
✅ Actions performedSummary regeneration triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)
21-22: Placeholder drastically reduces contributor guidance
Replacing the full Motivation and Context block with a bare “@coderabbitai summary” leaves new contributors without any indication of the information the maintainers expect. Consider keeping the original guidance inside an HTML comment — it stays hidden in rendered mode yet remains available as a template.-@coderabbitai summary +@coderabbitai summary + +<!-- +Please describe WHY this change is required, WHAT problem it solves, and HOW it is implemented. +Include any relevant context, trade-offs, and potential follow-ups. +-->.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
1-1: Typo in header comment
expections→exceptions.-# Give everyone ownership for everything expections listed below +# Give everyone ownership for everything exceptions listed below
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/CODEOWNERS(1 hunks).github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/pr-description.yml(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr-description.yml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/CODEOWNERS (2)
2-3: Double-check precedence of the global wildcard rule
* @wundergraph/Cosmo @wundergraph/Routeris fine, but remember that for equally-specific patterns the last match wins. If you ever add a second wildcard rule later in the file it could silently override this one.
7-30: Verify directory patterns include trailing slashes where intended
Patterns such ascli,router,studio, etc. match both the directory and any file named exactlycli,router,studio, … at repository root.
If you only mean directories, append a/per GitHub docs:cli/,router/, …
Summary by CodeRabbit
Checklist