feat(2.10): introduce #[AsFoudryHook] attribute
#986
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nikophil
force-pushed
the
feat/re-enable-as-foudry-hook
branch
2 times, most recently
from
843bbc8 to
36d9fa1
Compare
nikophil
changed the title
#[AsFoudryHook] attribute
nikophil
force-pushed
the
feat/re-enable-as-foudry-hook
branch
from
36d9fa1 to
6f0365f
Compare
nikophil
changed the title
#[AsFoudryHook] attribute#[AsFoudryHook] attribute
nikophil
changed the title
#[AsFoudryHook] attribute#[AsFoudryHook] attribute
nikophil
force-pushed
the
feat/re-enable-as-foudry-hook
branch
from
f9294dd to
3c326b3
Compare
nikophil
force-pushed
the
feat/re-enable-as-foudry-hook
branch
from
3c326b3 to
b0f6dad
Compare
nikophil
force-pushed
the
feat/re-enable-as-foudry-hook
branch
from
b0f6dad to
0e0ce1c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
initially merged in #802
as a bonus, I used the
AfterPersisthook inPersistedObjectsTrackerto fix the inelegant solution used in #980