Evaluating new clustering + sensor model

[glpuga]

Proposed changes

Note: this needs Ekumen-OS/beluga#476 to be merged before, because it assumes the new sensor model to be available.

This PR merges into the main Beluga evaluation report changes created to evaluate the impact of Ekumen-OS/beluga#476

Type of change

• 🐛 Bugfix (change which fixes an issue)
• 🚀 Feature (change which adds functionality)
• 📚 Documentation (change which fixes or extends documentation)

💥 Breaking change! Explain why a non-backwards compatible change is necessary or remove this line entirely if not applicable.

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. This is simply a reminder of what we will require before merging your code.

• Lint and unit tests (if any) pass locally with my changes
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Additional comments

Anything worth mentioning to the reviewers.

[glpuga]

end of line.

[glpuga]

This PR follows the tests and updates used to teset Ekumen-OS/beluga#476 (comment)

Unfortunately, the PR now has conflicts with main that would be unwise to fix in a hurry given that testing the changes would require at least doing a partial run and rebuild of the testbench, so this will have to wait until I'm back to move forward.

Regardless, this needs Ekumen-OS/beluga#476 to be merged before being merged, because it assumes the new sensor model to be available.

[glpuga]

This is the report produced by this version (except for this report the 24hs dataset was not used):
report.pdf

[hidmic]

Overall LGTM

[hidmic]

@glpuga meta: why adding these spaces? Google yields some XHTML connection to this formatting style that I don't think is relevant here.

[hidmic]

@glpuga meta: we really need a better way to deal with partial benchmark runs than these huge try...except blocks.