Skip to content

Conversation

@Woojin-Crive
Copy link
Member

Support ffw sensor board

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive self-assigned this Jun 24, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 24, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🌱 Todo in Platform Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily introduces support for new 'ffw' series sensor boards by integrating their control table definitions. It also includes a minor refinement to the Dynamixel communication logic, streamlining how multi-read and multi-write operations determine their communication type, and updates the package version.

Highlights

  • Dynamixel Model Catalog Update: The dynamixel.model file has been updated to include new model IDs for various ffw and omy series devices, ensuring they are recognized by the system. Some existing entries were also reordered for better organization.
  • Communication Logic Refinement: The internal logic within src/dynamixel/dynamixel.cpp for SetMultiDxlRead and SetMultiDxlWrite functions has been simplified. Redundant checks based on list size were removed, ensuring the communication type (sync or bulk) is consistently determined by the checkReadType() and checkWriteType() methods.
  • Package Version Update: The package version has been incremented to 1.4.9 in package.xml and noted in CHANGELOG.rst to reflect these new features and changes.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces support for new ffw sensor board models by adding their control table definitions and updating the dynamixel.model lookup file. It also includes minor code cleanups in src/dynamixel/dynamixel.cpp by removing redundant checks for list sizes before determining read/write types, which is a positive simplification. The changes are well-contained and directly address the stated objective. One minor typo was identified in a new model file.

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive moved this from 🌱 Todo to 📝 Pull Request in Platform Jun 24, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive requested review from DongyunRobotis and removed request for sunghowoo June 25, 2025 07:06
Copy link
Member

@DongyunRobotis DongyunRobotis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive merged commit 02841dd into main Jun 25, 2025
11 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📝 Pull Request to 🚩Done in Platform Jun 25, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive deleted the feature-ffw-sensor branch June 25, 2025 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants