Open
Conversation
fa4467e to
7ee65b2
Compare
Member
Author
|
I still need to address CLI integration... |
mvandenburgh
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2026
7ee65b2 to
112b08c
Compare
112b08c to
96562a3
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #2540
Closes #1653
Closes #1214
The primary purpose of this PR is to address an issue with asset validation errors for zarr assets. The existing behavior is to share the same status between assets that are in the process of validation, and zarr assets that cannot be validated yet (due to the underlying zarr not being finalized).
This is observed mostly on dandiset
000108, however other dandisets have experienced this as well. This change won't actually address the underlying problem, as the solution to that is simply to finalize the zarrs backing those assets (something I will address separately). However, it will fix the asset validation error that is shown, to more accurately describe the problem.There are several secondary improvements:
VALIDATINGstatus on the Asset model