-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
Add MachineHealthChecks for KCP Machines in e2e #5696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
/test ? |
|
@nojnhuh: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs: The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs: Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5696 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 52.84% 52.83% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 278 278
Lines 29610 29610
==========================================
- Hits 15647 15645 -2
- Misses 13146 13148 +2
Partials 817 817 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/hold for squash |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e |
|
/retest |
|
Flake appears to be in kubeadm: kubernetes/kubeadm#3152. MachineHealthCheck didn't remediate the node because the Node's Ready condition was still True. /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e-optional |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e |
|
Tests failed in exactly the way I was hoping to prevent, but I'd like to get a few runs in while I think to see if this is at least improving things. /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e |
|
So far it seems like MachineHealthChecks mostly fix the HA control plane flakes, but there are still quite a few flakes with Windows machines. I've split out the Windows changes from here and will iterate on those separately. /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e |
|
/retitle Add MachineHealthChecks for KCP Machines in e2e |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-optional |
|
I haven't seen the flake this is targeting occur in any of the runs on this PR, so I think this is ready. squashed! /hold cancel |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-optional |
|
/lgtm |
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 2eb7b1423a86a5b835d8be384507b9c526726009
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: willie-yao The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.19 |
|
@nojnhuh: #5696 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.19": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.20 |
|
@nojnhuh: new pull request created: #5719 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind flake
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds MachineHealthChecks which will remediate control plane nodes that fail to bootstrap in e2e tests.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #5687
Special notes for your reviewer:
TODOs:
Release note: