fix(conformance): Use pinned version of EPP for conformance test instead of main.

[zetxqx]

Fixes #1258, Used a pinned version of EPP for conformance tests

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	aa2eee6
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/gateway-api-inference-extension/deploys/68c35efe6db7d30008300a7e
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1262--gateway-api-inference-extension.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @zetxqx. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[zetxqx]

/hold

[kfswain]

Do we still need this pr?

[zetxqx]

/unhold

[zetxqx]

Do we still need this pr?

@kfswain thanks for reminding. Still need it for a stable conformance tests. I change the epp version to v1.0.0 for the conformance tests.

[robscott]

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

Longer term this should probably be part of our release process (cc @danehans @kfswain @nirrozenbaum)

[zetxqx]

/retest

[kfswain]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kfswain, zetxqx

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [kfswain]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[nirrozenbaum]

@zetxqx can you open a follow up issue to make sure this field is updated in the release script?

[zetxqx]

@zetxqx can you open a follow up issue to make sure this field is updated in the release script?

created #1606