Skip to content

Conversation

@divipillai
Copy link
Contributor

Update docs for the 2.9.2 release.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-required PR must not be merged without tech writer approval. label May 8, 2025
@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented May 8, 2025

CI Information

To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above
Build number: 14

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: 20a8a520503f4c017e320a3582c2bfe228c0d1c2

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: 20a8a520503f4c017e320a3582c2bfe228c0d1c2
merge base: 82b05dbe886a25a5398043033aa019220c91e7d9
target head (v2.9-branch): 82b05dbe886a25a5398043033aa019220c91e7d9
Diff

Github labels

Enabled Name Description
ci-disabled Disable the ci execution
ci-all-test Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
ci-force-downstream Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
ci-run-twister Force run twister
ci-run-zephyr-twister Force run zephyr twister
List of changed files detected by CI (8)
doc
│  ├── nrf
│  │  ├── app_dev
│  │  │  ├── device_guides
│  │  │  │  ├── nrf54h
│  │  │  │  │  │ ug_nrf54h20_gs.rst
│  │  ├── dev_model_and_contributions
│  │  │  │ adding_code.rst
│  │  ├── links.txt
│  │  ├── releases_and_maturity
│  │  │  ├── release_notes.rst
│  │  │  ├── releases
│  │  │  │  ├── release-notes-2.9.2.rst
│  │  │  │  │ release-notes-changelog.rst
│  │  │ shortcuts.txt
│  │ versions.json

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version:
Build docker image:

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

  • ◻️ Toolchain
  • ◻️ Build twister
  • ◻️ Integration tests
Disabled integration tests
    • desktop52_verification
    • doc-internal
    • test_ble_nrf_config
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-apps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-boot
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_mosh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_nrf_provisioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_positioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-thread
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-zigbee
    • test-low-level
    • test-sdk-audio
    • test-sdk-dfu
    • test-sdk-find-my
    • test-sdk-mcuboot
    • test-sdk-pmic-samples
    • test-sdk-sidewalk
    • test-sdk-wifi
    • test-secdom-samples-public

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from a1d8512 to f337099 Compare May 8, 2025 08:48
@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from f337099 to 695fd8e Compare May 8, 2025 08:57
@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from cc5df9e to f76b3ff Compare May 8, 2025 11:44
@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from f76b3ff to 9519958 Compare May 8, 2025 12:25
@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from 9519958 to a595430 Compare May 9, 2025 08:40
@divipillai divipillai marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 11:10
@divipillai divipillai requested review from a team and FrancescoSer as code owners May 9, 2025 11:10
Copy link
Contributor

@peknis peknis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved with a nit.

@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from a595430 to 70061b0 Compare May 14, 2025 12:43
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wbober, @shanthanordic - Please check the release highlights here.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes for NCs 2.9.2 it needs to be stated explicitly

@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from 37d43c0 to a0f59bc Compare May 14, 2025 13:52
@umapraseeda umapraseeda force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from a0f59bc to f95b481 Compare May 19, 2025 07:34
@peknis peknis added this to the 2.9.2 milestone May 23, 2025
@divipillai divipillai requested a review from wbober May 26, 2025 12:10
@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from f95b481 to 7b2692f Compare May 26, 2025 13:23
@divipillai divipillai removed the DNM label May 26, 2025
@divipillai divipillai requested a review from jukkar May 26, 2025 14:19
Copy link

@shanthanordic shanthanordic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PaalKastnes can you also take a look here

@shanthanordic shanthanordic requested a review from PaalKastnes May 27, 2025 05:34
Update docs for the 2.9.2 release.

Signed-off-by: divya pillai <[email protected]>
@divipillai divipillai force-pushed the update_docs_for_v2.9.2 branch from 7b2692f to 20a8a52 Compare May 27, 2025 09:03
@jukkar jukkar merged commit 439e0fb into nrfconnect:v2.9-branch May 27, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doc-required PR must not be merged without tech writer approval.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.