Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Feb 20, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

I missed this line disabling the test. (Splitting out re-enable of log_softmax because I think that one needs fixes.)

Differential Revision: D69929122

I missed this line disabling the test. (Splitting out re-enable of log_softmax because I think that one needs fixes.)

Differential Revision: [D69929122](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69929122/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8597

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 5168a78 with merge base 745be4e (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 20, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D69929122

swolchok pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
I missed this line disabling the test. (Splitting out re-enable of log_softmax because I think that one needs fixes.)

Differential Revision: [D69929122](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69929122/)

ghstack-source-id: 267434614
Pull Request resolved: #8597
I missed this line disabling the test. (Splitting out re-enable of log_softmax because I think that one needs fixes.)

Differential Revision: [D69929122](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69929122/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D69929122

I missed this line disabling the test. (Splitting out re-enable of log_softmax because I think that one needs fixes.)

Differential Revision: [D69929122](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69929122/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D69929122

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit f4d7917 into gh/swolchok/273/base Feb 25, 2025
50 checks passed
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/swolchok/273/head branch February 25, 2025 05:29
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
* Fix log_softmax along non-contiguous dim

Pull Request resolved: #8595

#8382 certainly didn't fix this problem (and added it on x86), but I don't think it was correct on ARM prior to that either.

Added a regression test.
ghstack-source-id: 268149462
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D69928884](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69928884/)

* Re-enable optimized gelu test in CMake

Pull Request resolved: #8597

I missed this line disabling the test. (Splitting out re-enable of log_softmax because I think that one needs fixes.)
ghstack-source-id: 268149463
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D69929122](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69929122/)

---------

Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <[email protected]>
kedarnath03 pushed a commit to kedarnath03/executorch that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/executorch#8597

I missed this line disabling the test. (Splitting out re-enable of log_softmax because I think that one needs fixes.)
ghstack-source-id: 267443264
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D69929122](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D69929122/)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants