-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Hotfix/ci precommit refactor 2025.10.30 #40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Consolidar modelos y Alembic; crear migración inicial no vacía - Limpiar duplicados en services/routers; JWT unificado TokenData - Tests RBAC completos; .env.example; README y docs/RBAC_GUIDE actualizados - Todos los tests pasan: 15 passed
… scripts and improve code formatting. Added new steps for code quality checks using Black, Ruff, and Mypy in the CI pipeline. Refactored migration scripts for consistency and clarity. Updated FastAPI routes to improve type hints and formatting.
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21960434 | Triggered | Generic Password | 406c3d0 | app/tests/test_auth.py | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR implements a complete RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) system for NeuroBank FastAPI Toolkit with comprehensive authentication, user management, and CI/CD pipeline. It adds JWT-based authentication with granular permissions, modern testing infrastructure, and production-ready deployment configurations.
Key Changes:
- Complete RBAC implementation with Users, Roles, and Permissions models
- JWT authentication system with refresh tokens and permission-based access control
- Comprehensive testing suite with 15+ test cases covering auth, users, and roles
- Full CI/CD pipeline with quality checks, security scanning, and automated deployment
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 61 out of 337 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
app/auth/ |
JWT authentication system with dependencies and password handling |
app/models.py |
RBAC database models with User-Role-Permission relationships |
app/routers/ |
API endpoints for authentication, user management, and role management |
app/services/ |
Business logic for user and role operations with error handling |
alembic/ |
Database migration system for RBAC schema |
.github/workflows/ |
Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline with quality and security checks |
docker-compose.yml |
Development environment with monitoring stack |
Makefile |
Development workflow automation with quality tools |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Neiland85
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Revisados la mitad de los archivos anclados a este bloque y rama.
|
@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #41, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <[email protected]>
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #42, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #43, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #44, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #45, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <[email protected]>
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #46, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #47, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #48, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #49, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #50, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@Neiland85 I've opened a new pull request, #51, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
Neiland85
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Revisadas modificaciones de la rama y bloque.
|
Convirtiendo este PR a “Draft”: no tengo permiso/endpoint para cambiar el estado directamente desde aquí. Por favor usa el botón “Convert to draft” en la UI de GitHub en este PR. Alcance actualizado del draft:
Sugerencias de labels para triage: ci, lint, automation. Cuando lo marques como Draft, puedo actualizar la descripción y checklists si lo necesitas. |
* Initial plan * Fix ruff TC006: Add quotes to type expressions in typing.cast() Co-authored-by: Neiland85 <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Neiland85 <[email protected]>
|
Closing this PR. The changes no longer align with the updated architecture and dependency model introduced in the December 2025 refactor. This contribution is now obsolete and would add noise rather than value to the current codebase. |
CI: Ruff JSON + creación automática de issues; script de ingestión mejorado
Resumen breve:
scripts/create_issues_from_logs.py:--ruff-json)gh issue createghy limpieza de lintsChecklist:
.github/workflows/ci.ymlNotas:
--templateno se usa junto a--body(limitación de gh CLI)--labelEtiquetas sugeridas:
ci,lint,automation.