Skip to content

Conversation

@dorimedini-starkware
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@reviewable-StarkWare
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware self-assigned this Jun 27, 2025
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 10:54
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 06-27-blockifier_box_transactionprevalidationerror_in_transactionexecutionerror branch from 40ac03e to 83d6b0b Compare June 30, 2025 11:23
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 06-27-blockifier_box_validatetransactionerror_in_transactionexecutionerror branch from e64172f to e275910 Compare June 30, 2025 11:23
Copy link
Collaborator

@amosStarkware amosStarkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)


-- commits line 2 at r1:
you're boxing RecursionDepthExceeded in ValidateTransactionError, no?

Code quote:

 e275910: blockifier: box ValidateTransactionError in TransactionExecutionError

Copy link
Collaborator

@amosStarkware amosStarkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)


-- commits line 2 at r1:

Previously, amosStarkware wrote…

you're boxing RecursionDepthExceeded in ValidateTransactionError, no?

scratch that: EntryPointExecutionError in ValidateTransactionError, no?

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 06-27-blockifier_box_transactionprevalidationerror_in_transactionexecutionerror branch from 83d6b0b to d18b935 Compare June 30, 2025 12:14
@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware force-pushed the 06-27-blockifier_box_validatetransactionerror_in_transactionexecutionerror branch from e275910 to 04e09a6 Compare June 30, 2025 12:14
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @amosStarkware)


-- commits line 2 at r1:

Previously, amosStarkware wrote…

scratch that: EntryPointExecutionError in ValidateTransactionError, no?

right, but the point is reducing the size of ValidateTransactionError in TransactionExecutionError

Copy link
Collaborator

@amosStarkware amosStarkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware changed the base branch from 06-27-blockifier_box_transactionprevalidationerror_in_transactionexecutionerror to main June 30, 2025 14:24
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1, 5 of 5 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 1, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit cbfa9f1 Jul 1, 2025
38 of 42 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 3, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants